The study of the measurement of liver volume by methods of multi-slice spiral CT and displacement method
Chao Sun1, Wei Gao1, Zhongyang Shen1.
1Transplantation Department, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China
Objective: To compare the methods of liver volume measurements by multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) and displacement method in vitro.
Method: Eight abandoned donor liver were selected. The whole and half liver volume were measured by MSCT and displacement method in vitro separately. Correlation coefficient was used for statistical analysis.
Result: The volume measured by MSCT was relative to the volume measured by displacement method. There was no significant difference between the whole liver volumes measured by the two methods (R square=0.9173, P<0.05). And there was also no significant difference between the right liver volumes measured by the two methods (R square=0.7728, P<0.05). The liver volume measured by MSCT was smaller than the liver volume measured by displacement method.
Conclusion: The volume measured by MSCT was accurate and relative to the volume measured by displacement method in vitro.
Cheng Yue. Shen Wen.
References:
[1] Sakamoto, S., M. Kasahara, Y. Ogura, et al., Current status of deceased donor split liver transplantation in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2015.
[2] Ringe, K.I., B.P. Ringe, C. von Falck, et al., Evaluation of living liver donors using contrast enhanced multidetector CT - The radiologists impact on donor selection. BMC Med Imaging, 2012. 12: p. 21.
[3] Mokry, T., N. Bellemann, D. Muller, et al., Accuracy of estimation of graft size for living-related liver transplantation: first results of a semi-automated interactive software for CT-volumetry. PLoS One, 2014. 9(10): p. e110201.
[4] Wathen, C.A., N. Foje, T. van Avermaete, et al., In vivo X-ray computed tomographic imaging of soft tissue with native, intravenous, or oral contrast. Sensors (Basel), 2013. 13(6): p. 6957-80.
[5] Hori, M., K. Suzuki, M.L. Epstein, et al., Computed tomography liver volumetry using 3-dimensional image data in living donor liver transplantation: effects of the slice thickness on the volume calculation. Liver Transpl, 2011. 17(12): p. 1427-36.
[6] Suzuki, K., M.L. Epstein, R. Kohlbrenner, et al., Quantitative radiology: automated CT liver volumetry compared with interactive volumetry and manual volumetry. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011. 197(4): p. W706-12.
[7] S. M. Nichues, J.K.U., M. Malinowsik, J. Neymeyer, B. Hamm, M. Stockmann, Liver volume measurement: reason of the difference between in vivo CT-volumetry and intraoperative ex vivo determination and how to cope it. Eur J Med Res, 2010. 15.
[8] D'Onofrio, M., R. De Robertis, E. Demozzi, et al., Liver volumetry: Is imaging reliable? Personal experience and review of the literature. World J Radiol, 2014. 6(4): p. 62-71.
[9] Goumard, C., F. Perdigao, J. Cazejust, et al., Is computed tomography volumetric assessment of the liver reliable in patients with cirrhosis? HPB (Oxford), 2014. 16(2): p. 188-94.
[10] Kianmanesh, R., T. Piardi, E. Tamby, et al., Liver angulometry: a simple method to estimate liver volume and ratios. HPB (Oxford), 2013. 15(12): p. 976-84.
Lectures by Chao Sun
| When | Session | Talk Title | Room |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sat-20 17:00 - 18:30 |
Liver Posters | The study of the measurement of liver volume by methods of multi-slice spiral CT and displacement method | Hall 5FG-Level 5 |