P.1495 Efficacy and Safety of Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin or Interleukin-2 Receptor Antagonist for Induction Therapy in Chinese Living Donor Renal Transplantation Recipients: a Retrospective Study
Saturday August 20, 2016 from 17:00 to 18:30
Hall 5FG-Level 5
Presenter

Jiang Qiu, People's Republic of China

associate professor

Division of Organ transplantation

the First affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

Abstract

Efficacy and safety of rabbit antithymocyte globulin or interleukin-2 receptor antagonist for induction therapy in Chinese living donor renal transplantation recipients: A retrospective study

Jiang Qiu1, Gang Huang1, Lizhong Chen1, Changxi Wang1, Guodong Chen1, Jun Li1, Qian Fu1, Jiguang Fei1, Suxiong Deng1.

1Division of Organ Transplantation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China

Introduction: KDIGO 2009 guidelines recommend interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2-RA) as a 1st-line induction therapy for living donor renal transplantation. The relatively-more-potent immunosuppressant rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) has been associated with a lower risk of acute rejection and higher rate of infection compared with IL2-RA, and is recommended for high-risk donor recipients. This retrospective study compared the efficacy and safety of rATG with IL-2RA in Chinese patients who underwent living donor renal transplant over a 10-year period.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis included 188 adult (≥18 years) patients who received induction immunosuppression and underwent living donor renal transplantation at our institution from Feb 2004–Dec 2013. Patients were stratified based on induction therapy received; rATG (thymoglobulin) 1 mg/kg/day at Day 0–Day 2 after transplantation (n=41), or IL2-RA (basiliximab) 20 mg/day at Day 0–Day 3 after transplantation (n=147). The main outcome was incidence of acute rejection. Other outcomes included detection of de novo donor-specific antigen (dn-DSA), graft survival, and rate of infection.

Results and Discussion: The rATG group had a higher mean panel reactive antigen (PRA) score, and more complete human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches, compared with the IL2-RA group (Table). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute rejection between the rATG and IL2-RA groups (9.8% vs. 8.8%), although patients in the rATG group had a significantly lower rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) (p=0.01) (Table). There was no significant difference in 1, 3 or 5-year graft (Figure 1) or recipient (data not shown) survival between the two groups. The safety profile in both treatment groups was comparable, which is contrary to current treatment guidelines and previous research that showed a relatively lower rate of infection with IL-2RA versus rATG (Table). Given that dn-DSAs directed against HLA are one of the major risk factors for allograft failure, it is interesting that this study found the incidence of dn-DSA was comparable in the rATG (two cases [4.9%]) and IL2-RA (seven cases [5.4%]) groups.

Conclusion: It may be beneficial to stratify high-risk renal donor recipients to induction with rATG; similar efficacy and safety outcomes were achieved for higher-risk patients following rATG, with a lower rate of BPAR, compared with relatively lower-risk patients treated with IL-2RA.

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Fund project (81470976), the National Natural Science Fund Youth Science project (81302549).

References:

[1] Guodong Chen, Xingqiang Lai, Dicken Shiu-Chung KO, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety between rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin and anti-T lymphocyte globulin in kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death: A retrospective cohort study. Nephrology. 2015; 20: 539–543.
[2] Brokhof MM, Sollinger HW, Hager DR, et al. Antithymocyte globulin is associated with a lower incidence of de novo donor-specific antibodies in moderately sensitized renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2014; 6: 612-617.
[3] Everly MJ, Rebellato LM, Haisch CE, et al. Incidence and impact of de novo donor-specific alloantibody in primary renal allografts. Transplantation. 2013; 3:410-417.


© 2017 TTS2016